Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010
Macaulay, C., D. Benyon & A. Crerar. 2000. Ethnography, theory and systems design: from intuition to insight. Human-Computer Studies. 53: 35-60.
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT)
-       “Would design not benefit more from training better ethnographers than from burdening them with such a complex set of theoretical concepts and debates as CHAT?â€
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Explicit use of theoretical frameworks encourages reflexivity
-       Suchman: systems designers are disadvantaged as a result of the distance between them and the subjects/objects of their design.
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â How to help inexperienced design ethnographers makes the transition from intuition to design insight
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â User-centered design is beginning to expand the requirements of workflows to include knowing the social user as well as individual – Is it also not encouraging ethnography?
-       Ethnomethodological terms: issues here is not so much “context a resource†but “context as topicâ€- so should we focus on how to use contextual information or on what we mean by contextual info?
-       “Suchman proposed that that since tools reify underlying models of the activity they are designed to support, developing an underlying conceptions is a crucial part of the design.â€
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Ethnography set of methods, not theory
-       Tension between “traditional†ethnographer, whose object is to simply describe and interpret cultures (?!) and the design ethnographer whose aim is toe describe and interpret cultures for the purpose of design a tool that will change the culture
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Relationship between ethnography and design dialogue btwn attitude, validity and practicality
-       Attitude of computer professionals to qualitative “soft†data
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Openness about theoretical decision in the field may establish greater validity
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Ethnographer presented different by engineers and anthropologists
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Design ethnographers have own quick and dirty approach to ethnography
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Ethnomethodologists claim to have broken with sociologist in that description is not a precursor to analysis, but a means by which to know
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Theory can enlighten and provide insight into arising problems or confusion
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Information gathering in design world can come down to stricter deadlines
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â We can only understand the mind with reference to the interaction with the material world that produces the contents of the mind.
-       “Implications for designâ€
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Can theoretical frameworks improve the client-designer relationship?
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Or does it become authoritative?
Check out:
Anderson, A &Alty, J.L. 1995. Everyday theories, cognitive anthropology and user-centered systems design…
Bauman, Z. 1999. Culture as Praxis…
Berg, M. 1998. The politics of technology…
Brown, B. 1998. Working notes:how computers used for collaborative work…
Marcus, G. 1986. Contemporary problems of ethnography in the modern world system….
Tags: Anthrodesign, design ethnography, designer views, expert model, participant observation, relationship technology user, wordpress, workflow
Posted in Anthropology, Article notes, research methods | 38 Comments »
Monday, June 7th, 2010
Date of Event: June 3, 2010
What: Apps for Good London by CDI Europe: Monthly Networking Drinks
Who: Apps for Good : http://appsforgood.org/
Where: Las Iguanas – Spitalfields Market
What happened:
Tonight I attended the Meetup Group: Apps for Good. An amazing organization that does this:
Apps for Good is the new programme by CDI Europe where young people learn to create apps that change their world. During April/ May 2010 we will be running the first prototype course at the High Trees Development Trust in Tulse Hill/South London and envision to expand to four other locations in the UK by the end of the year. And Rodrigo Baggio, CDI’s founder, wants to see 50 CDI Community Centres in the UK by the end of 2011…
Quite impressive I must say, with a great following of people helping to get the project off the ground.
Received quite a bit of good information, apologies for the disjointed thought process, but going to note point by point:
-       Language: A small conversation began surrounding the fact that: “Language is impreciseâ€. Often, for successful interdisciplinary communication, or in this case client-designer communication, participants either need to use language that resides in one of the opposing systems or to find a point of convergence that allows for more fluid understanding. To what level then are web designers responsible for educating their clients?
-       Terminology: The term “emerging markets†was used at some point in the evening and appears to be quite popular in the web industry. I realize that the world is yet to find a term that not relative to the USA, Britain etc… but better suited would be a term that does not directly imply a move toward the capitalist market system.  I am certainly not against the use of technology in populations where there is less exposure, but it would be preferred that technology be developed as a result of research done for a specific location and need rather than imposed.
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Agile Definition: Another definition of Agile development for comparison: reducing risk for a project and letting client and others know that changes are allow. Reducing stress as a whole. Setting priority at certain junctions, but being flexible.
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Nonprofit Web Designer: Spoke to my first female web designer! And she was fantastic. A large portion of what was spoken about had to do accessibility and a comparison between her work with larger corporations and nonprofits. For larger corporations would not make their site accessible until they knew that the time put into such a task would also increase their revenue. Therefore, until this was assured and had moved through the hierarchy to be approved by all the correct individuals, nothing could be done by her as the web designer. And of course in the end, greater accessibility does mean great revenue. Nonprofits on the other hand, do not usually have the same hierarchy that would limit web designers from making the site accessible, they normally want an accessible site because it fits with their ideals (Digital Inclusion) and generally there is just greater need to reach as many people as possible. It was also for this reason that working with nonprofits was a positive experience for her. Being allowed more freedom, but being driven by the ideals of the nonprofit makes the process of web design more pleasant. Not to mention, that when working with a nonprofit often times any labor time that you can donate is appreciated whether or not you able to create exactly what planned.
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Wordpress and Nonprofits: This web designer stated she also uses Wordpress because it is just best looking and easiest thing to get up and running. A common statement for sure among web designers. Following, CMSs are useful because themes are built to be compliant, again allowing an organization to reach more people across platforms. She stated without following set standards, communication eventually does break down.
-       Documentation: For particular nonprofit sites, she did go through some processes of wireframing, but alterations in templates are relatively easy to make as well. Previous web designers have also stated that they bypass a lot of documentation because Wordpress’ basic installation allows one to organize content easily before implementing the theme.
-       Nonprofits + Agencies: She has seen nonprofits go to agencies for websites and what is given to them is a cookie-cutter site that is fast and easy for the agency, but lacks commitment to the nonprofit’s cause or needs.
-       New App: Also found out that there has been an app developed that automatically makes websites accessible and works with variety of screen readers etc… thus relieving lazy web designers of the work it takes to make the site accessible. Link anyone?
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Open Source: I also asked at this Meetup whether they agreed that a lot of corporations distrust free software and there was blanket disagreement. This is in opposition to the answer I received previously. Both groups of people were developers and designers. The group agreeing were individuals involved in the creation of an open source CMS, the group disagreeing were quite mixed. Not sure.
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Value Chain: One member of the Meetup also brought up an interesting point about where people and data fall in the value chain. It is not until someone is able to make use of data, to build an app etc., that the data actually becomes valuable. It has then been given a use-value that can be exchanged at an entirely different level and possible even for something it was not intended for. *Would be interesting delve deeper into the movement of data through the market.
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Sustainability of technology: The same member also stated he is facing the issue of how to make technology sustainable and accessible in order to allow continued use of the data gathered by his organization. If funding is cut, then technology must be easy to use and maintainable by the greater community. Â In replacing community with nonprofit, the same value applies. How can web designers implement a sustainable technology that allows nonprofits to maintain their website (their data and information) cheaply and easily? To provide ownership?
-       CDI: The goal of CDI is was my initial goal when attempting to figure out my research project. To find an issue and then use technology to solve it. In the end, my current project was more feasible, as I do not have the technological expertise to build the necessary app., plug-in, software etc. In my master’s next year in Human Centered Design and Engineering I will have a chance to work in a group where everyone has a different skill set to bring to the table. Making such a project possible.
Points I am not sure what to do with quite yet:
-       One of the participants stated that, “technologists simply learn to fix problems that they create themselvesâ€. I realize this cannot be taken at face value, but does remind us that user needs, while currently often in the forefront, are not the only factor driving innovation.
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Work acceptance? The meaning of this is on the tip of my tongue. I know it was explained. Anybody help me out? Roles of client and designer? Is it relating to scope creep?
Links to check out:
CDI – http://cdieurope.eu/
Our mission is to transform lives and strengthen low-income communities by empowering people with information and communication technology.
http://www.itforcharities.co.uk/
IT resource guide for charities.
To be “The UK organisation that has the most impact on how Civil Society organisations can exploit the technology resources they need to improve their effectiveness, achieve their aims and, in turn, improve the lives of the people they serveâ€.
http://mulqueeny.wordpress.com/
Bio Co-Founder Rewired State & government-y type person. Sadly passionate about: Transformational Govnt, Smarter Govnt, Data, Power of information, Geeks.
Rewired State runs hackdays where developers show government what is possible, and government shows developers what is needed.
http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/
Ordnance Survey is Great Britain’s national mapping agency, providing the most accurate and up-to-date geographic data, relied on by government, business and individuals.
CMS/website publishing software
Tags: cms, designer views, expert model, Nonprofit, ownership, relationship technology user, ucd, web design, wordpress, workflow
Posted in Meetups | 165 Comments »
Sunday, June 6th, 2010
Interviewee: Ronen Hirsh
Location: Israel
Duration: 1:15
Date: April 26th 2010
*Transcription okay, no audio recording on field note blog.
Can you provide with your job title, or area of expertise?
No, I can’t actually, I don’t know. I am unemployed, and I have been for a few years. I am a yoga teacher; I have dabbled in the arts, and my own personal needs to express self online led me to gain some sort of mastery in Wordpress. And that brought about some additional skills.
How many years have you been doing web design then?
I had a 15 year tech career, the last 2 years was design of general software products. I have been using Wordpress for about 3 years.
How if at all would you label your workflow when building a website for someone?
Personal and intuitive.
*intuition is used quite often as a description of skill-set
What % of projects use WP?
I only use Wordpress.
Is there a type of client that wants WP more often?
I get all kinds of queries, and many that I don’t take on or don’t work out. From my perspective there are people who want WP and see it as an opportunity to express themselves and others who see it as a technical solution that is comfortable and usually they are not well attuned to what Wordpress does. So there is a bit of friction with WP, and it happens more with commercial websites than people or organizations that want to say something. They are looking for a cheap solution and Wp is free and in that kind of dialogue. Israel different from rest of the world, and I got a project today from a nonprofit that actually helped me. The general quality of web services in Israel is really lousy, and there are 2 or 3 companies that dominate the internet, and if you are not a web professional and are not up to date on what is going on these companies are well known, but they do a lousy job, and they have lousy CMS systems and that are very pricy. Price point is very a strong point, so when they hear about WP they want to gravitate towards it. But cheap solution in not my thing.
What is the new project?
I was amused that it happened. The organization is called New Family, because in Israel there is no legislation concerning family status. Family status is based on tradition not on law. I met and married a Romanian woman, and there was no way for us to get married in Israel, so this organization helped us do this. *interesting! Linked here. So they really rescued us. We paid them a symbolic amount, because they were a nonprofit, and if we have gone to law offices we would have paid a lot more. The person who emailed me, didn’t actually know about me, as it was eight years ago, but had seen me on a job listing. I wrote him back, saying that even if he had no money to pay me, it was an opportunity to give back.
Could you tell me the name of nonprofit and what sort of work they do?
Nonprofits are atypical because I do not do this commercially. *Interviewee gave three choices of websites. This is what I chose….
Third and biggest project is my wife. My wife is Romanian and she has created a website called feminity in Romanian, and this website has been up for a year in and month now. Over 400 women are visiting each day getting close to 2000 pages. It deals with issues that are just not available in Romanian, just does not exist. Women’s health, fertility, pregnancy, it is not organized as nonprofit yet legally in Romania. But there is an agenda here, and this is the biggest project and the one most closely involved with because it’s my wife.
It’s gone through the most iteration. There are a lot of content. How the design process happened, and how it happened and the needs. And it is live and working.
If you want to start talking what happened start to finish that is fine, if you feel comfortable doing so. However I can also provide questions for you, or markers for you to follow. Do you feel comfortable just starting?
I have a lot to say about Wordpress and how it’s done.
I believe that one of the greatest misconceptions,
What is different about nonprofits, and it is really about a sense of purpose. Rather than commercial and wanting to make money. One of the biggest misconceptions about Wordpress and websites in general is that it is a technical challenge. What I find that is that it is a content challenge. Writing, you know and people trying to make websites and just say they want a website with just 4 pages, content etc., not just a waste of money, but it is wrong to do. IF you expect Google to find you, or for anything to happen, I have this metaphor I like to use. If you are not updating your website all the time, it’s like having a telephone line that is open to thousands of people and you are not saying anything. It’s kinda awkward. And the biggest challenge I find is connecting the idea of content creation to their lives, or work. Even with Andrea, my wife it is not a simple process. We don’t know how install Wp, make it SEO friendly etc…To do many technical things, and I say look that’s the easy part. Cause you are going to end up with a website and now what? And then you need to learn the discipline or writing, of pacing self and creating consistency. And that goes the other example of the website I gave you, the website that is not alive, is just dead in the water. And it hurts me, esp. because I care, I could say it is your business, your project, but I do care. And that is the most difficult aspect to get across to people.  People think it is just a technology issue. And this goes the same for personal blogs, and I say are you sure? Because I can make all the technical problems disappear, but then what? Like when they say in Feng Shui, water that is not flowing is unhealthy, this is the most difficult part I find in the process. And that changes the project from a web design project to something different all together. It is a long process of guiding and being there for them. What to do when I don’t feel like writing, what to do when I have nothing to say. Issues that come from the world of writing and not from web technologies. It is an ongoing process, there is no finish. This makes it difficult to price it. The most time consuming process I have that I put into any project is my attention. If someone comes to me once or twice a month with a question, they are with me that month. And if I have 10 clients that month, I am not emotionally well. If someone can come to me at anytime, and they want to know this or this. Goes back to my yoga routine. Should I be charging them? Is this part of the work. There is always a clear beginning, but it is an ongoing process.
Andrea’s website we just launched the third design. It is not a whim, it is not because we feel like it, it is because we run into an issue and we have to decide what to do now.
*happens often with all clients, that simply can’t predict an issues until in the process, but nonprofit have less money to deal with them.
If I were an outsourcing developer that would be an another design project. And I honestly don’t know how to deal with this as a solutions provider, because its expensive to do a web design project each year. When you need money to sustain yourself. No way around it.
One of my biggest qualms with WP is that that it is not simple, it is complicated to use. I have been trying to raise this qualm in the community for some time now and I gave up on it. Because they are all developer and developers like to have options and lots of buttons. I have stopped counting on how many times I have taught people to use it.
Do you teach people to use Wordpress as part of the process or do you wait till the end?
That is where the intuitive part of the process comes in. I do it whenever it is necessary. I try as a matter of process to get people writing as soon as possible. Either on a notepad or do it online. Someone I just install Wordpress and tell them to get started. I give them a staging environment somewhere on my domain, and tell them to write their first post. Or write their about me page. That is the biggest one. I generally push toward them getting started on the writing as early as possible. Many times there isn’t even a logo or an identity. SO it has to start somewhere. So if someone sees a website with their content it is much more approachable and they can relate to it. It is not a philosophical question do I like this design? Which is terrible design wise? Do I like it or not? This is a very narrow question. OS I try to get people writing as soon as possible. Because it is never soon enough. There is always resistance to it.
*also found this a problem for myself trying to blog field notes. Difficult to get started.
I have never come across a person who did not resist writing. It sounds so easy when you see it from the outside, but if it is your first time doing it, it is a huge obstacle. Anyway that is my experience consistently  with people.
When you teach people how to use Wordpress, do you do it in Web design terms, or in a vernacular that speaks better to people who are not technologically literate?
I will always look for metaphor languages that relates to the person I am teaching. I do try to get some basic vocab now, so I can say post, page or category and they know what it is.
*language related to software that allows client to maintain site selves. Not to technology that created software.
But it always comes across better when there is a personal association or relationship. Their category, if they have a list that is relevant to them they understand what the category is, and not some distance technological concept and they just don’t get it.
Its like about a long time go, I taught this kid math,…doing these kind of basic algebra and if you buy 5 oranges etc.. and the kid couldn’t get it. So I used gummi bears and he got it.
Does this make people wanted to update things and increase their investment?
It is better for a project to fail early on if they can’t get into it, and then have it launch and have it be dead. So I push this as soon as possible for people o get involved early on. This also informs and drives the design. I am not a professional designer, and you have much more design skill than I do, I do basic designs and layouts because I do not believe that it is important. When people get too caught up in Details about colrs etc… come-on nobody, not even you are going to notice this eventually. But if you don’t have content, it’s like you are trying to avoid the issues. It doesn’t matter if it doesn’t say anything, because its pretty! Well that only works once. So that also inspires me, so see someone’s about page. Where do you want to go, what do you want your organization to be. It’s tightly coupled with organization itself. And this is the issues to me. I am staying away because I believe the technical issue are not the issues.
I worked 2 years at a high end design consult, and company would pay tens of thousands of dollars and the design manager will say, I do not like Blue. Should that be a factor in the design process? Should I take you therapy and explain what a lame comment that is? I really try to , honestly, I work with people a very low budget , and I can’t afford to muck around with design so many design revisions. Let’s just get this done properly.
*important for nonprofits
I am starting another project with cousin in the states who has a psychology practice. He asked how much it would cost, and I said I don’t know. Whatever you want to pay. Because honestly I believe the conversation we are having now, is something that most web designers don’t do. They focus on the obvious things. This is my experience and insight in working with technology and products in the tech industry and now I am bringing it to you on a personal level. SO you know if I were to price this, and when I consult I have a really high per hour rate and you wouldn’t’ be able to afford me. I and we had a really amazing process, and he was afraid to this because maybe he didn’t have enough to offend me, and he is three months into it and he is still thinking about the name and we are having conversations about the name and vision the goals. And I said to him imagine if we had some sort of agreement, I should be telling you come on man, we had an agreement, we have to get this done. And that is just wrong.
In what ways do you think web designer thwart the conversation? Sort of put clients in their place in some ways?
I think it is where it hurts the most; it is how involved you are. You can’t afford for me to be involved more than you can afford???. When you offer a quote, it assumes a certain amount of effort and I don’t think there is a web designer or technologist out there that doesn’t know it is not going to exceed . Your starting point then becomes how do I reign this in, and I am thinking how do I open this up? IF you are thinking reigning this in, your aren’t going to go anywhere.
A lot of illusion. Yeah there are a lot of cheap prices for 200 dollars. I am not even willing to talk to you for a certain amounts of money. I won’t even tell you why you shouldn’t for that amount of money. I had this same conversation with the large scale design firms, something would cost 30,000 dollars and they would say well I can get an independent freelancer to do it for 6, 000. And I say, by all means go for it and I will see you 2 years down the line, not selling and not working and it will cost you more on principle.
Does WP affect your workflow specifically in being more open or is it just a tool?
I can say two things about this. First of all, because it was originally a blogging tool, it has an amazing quality that pushes toward blogging. It is intuited in how it works, and I try to embrace this. Because the very idea that it does have categories and is time based, it pushes towards having a conversation in a website.
*conversation
The second thing is that it makes life simple for me. I tell people, I am not a developer and if you want this and this, and I can do anything that Wordpress has in terms of good plug-ins. So I can’t do anything for you that Wordpress also cannot do. Has to be good plugins, many are not.
*in that way shapes what is going online and also what nonprofits can do
When people come to me with needs and requirements, let’s see how we put this onto what Wordpress can do.
Because you are not a developer, and you are using Wordpress’ functions, do you think this opens up more time for you to have a relationship with the nonprofits?
I think it keeps, puts more weight on content and functional design. It has to be simple to do in Wordpress. If it is complicated, I am not your man.
If it is too complicated it is misusing the platform.
…Going back to the specific project and talking about the process.
Online you can see how it’s evolved…*link
Started as Hebrew website…but nothing was happening. No comments etc…
IN the Romanian site there are comments and not a week goes by that my wife does not get an email saying that it has changed her life. And that is a kind of rewarding experience because we are not getting any money for this. And we gave up on the Hebrew site.
Andrea wanted to start doing it in Romanian. SO took the theme, translated it to English and put it online. And the feedback was amazing. One person writing. We have a page about basic human anatomy and like 15,000 women read it. That is a huge achievement I think. So it started like this and at one point, trying to think back, I am not very orderly.
??? Fuzzy recording
I design on paper, and when I am done designing throw it out.
The first major change, occurred when the amount of content increased. We had a magazine type layout with 4 categories. Newspaper websites, with categories under topics. This brought more content to the front. The nature of the blog is for old content to sink down below, but this was wrong for that sort of context. The first articles are as relevant as the new ones.
This was the first thing that we addressed, so needed to more air time for more posts.
This is process, it was not some kind of light change, it, but it was a very specific need. How do we get people to see that there is more content here than what is on this page?
Categories are not enough.  People don’t click. What is in front of people’s s face is what they are going to see. There will always be the women who are more invested and more interested and because they have personal problems, and will do digging a round but most people are browsing though. So I got to make sure they meet the content we want them to meet in the browsing process. That was the second design iteration.
Added an email subscription. With over 400 women. It uses to be automated emails, and now its manual, so it is more personal. There is a summary in the mail.
Ops now I am skipping.
The last iteration is about a month or two old. What you see now. And actually I think there was a first major visual re design, needed to be a lighter and open color palette. What Andrea asked for was a shift…when there is just one person doing it, it is an uphill battle. And she found that people actually thought the project was much larger than that. And there are serious articles and all professional on diverse issues.
So this realization that people see this as bigger. SO her wish was to make this a nonprofit organization, not a nonprofit her, and acknowledging the fact that this is bigger. She was in Romainia was a few months because she wanted to meet people an promote the work, and the women and she stayed with friends there, and people opened up their homes to her, and she realized in a way they were already involved. It wasn’t really just her anymore. So we wanted to acknowledge this in the design, and this was the big change we were working towards. What you see on the website in the header is her. It is her picture. And people thought it wasn’t here, people couldn’t believe it was actually her.
*what nonprofits often rely on
When she went to Romania did she do interviews? Just speak to people?
We had an agenda, but we just were open. In the end it was about getting closer to the realities of Romania. In Israel there are a lot of options when it comes to birthing..etc.  A menu of birthing. And our natural preference is towards home birthing. But to preach this to a Romanian woman is just stupid, because natural childbirth is one where the doctor does not light a cigarette between their legs. You expect the world to be as you know it, and it’s not. If she wants to give knowledge, it has to knowledge that is accessible and relevant to the realities of life in Romania. In that sense the visit was very important. Realizing what is possible.
It is like anthropology participant observation then.
Yeah, exactly. There is nothing like going there and being in it. One of her topics is able aromatherapy and being a herbalist. But in Romania you don’t have as many options as in Israel. Need to know what options make it relevant. No use giving advice to people that they can’t use. The agenda really is to move our lives back there.
She is looking for organization in Romania to help us get support and to get more people involved and collaboration that will help us make the transition and to get more women involved. Already have another woman who is a writer and write about her personal story or journal.
If you look at the website there are some design issues or solutions that address needs. If you are the homepage you can see that there is the post has a gravatar next to it. What happened was, a recent change, this women, a guest woman, and she started writing and from a personal perspective and what we realized was that it came across as another post. And the funny thing was that someone replied to one of her posts and she became a consultant. And we said well this not what you are here for.  Okay and because it was also controversial. And it is kind of way down, and it shows that it is a personal entry. And give them a different feel. If you open up a journal entry it opens up a different looking page. Shows the difference between an article and a personal story. But the comment did not fit into the experience of reading. The conditional tags changed the looks. And it was really powerful because it changed the way things were done on the site. Should we not have women writing or what to do?
Do you make the major decisions on the website together?
Yes. And it is another reason of why the process needs to be intimate. If I was an outsourcing service this change would have been complicated. We sit here in the living room and we talk about it, and sit here and describe it to you now easily because I now know what happed, but we sat and discussed what made us uncomfortable for a few hours in the living room before we figured it out. And I suggested one design solution, and she disagreed. It is processing of discovery. Not one of knowing. But you experience something on the website and they you take the time to figure out what to do with it.
I have done a lot of design projects in my life, and this is not something I could have expected or preempted. It was a few weeks of work and interactions. Until this happened, I could not foresee this problem. Any design spec I could have made would have come across this it. When it hurts you, you solve it. Big words, high talking, not relevant.
Another design story if you go back to the home page, if you click on one of the posts, let’s say new biological in Romania. There are 2, I wanted to write about this, things you can do with Wordpress, but I have lost motivation to give back to the Wordpress community. There are two things here, two achievements. Remember how I told you things would sink into history. Now here you see a random sampling of posts, and see content flowing by, so women can see variety of information. It brings up 4 or 5 random posts. SO even if the user does not do anything, content still moves by. And this is on every post page.
Another one, if you notice below the post title, there is a box, that is gray bluish with a title. What we created here, part of growing into a state of mind of an organization, we wanted to express, we wanted to have a wanted section, how you can participate in this organization. Calling out to more women to be part of the process. Created a new call to action category. Great, but how are you going to get people to see this. Every time a woman reads an article, there is a suggestion for how you can participate in this process. All these things are coming from a wish to grow. Not only to create a perception on the outside, but to create a realization on the outside that is it more than just the two of us. And we have had women writing in, and we have gotten help with translating.
And suddenly things started moving, cause people started seeing our wanted ads. And People being to see and respond. And this is the kind of stuff, and what I can say about feminitate. And what may expand the picture for you in another link* Have you ever heard about fertility awareness methods….it is…by observing bodily signs you can predict when you will be most fertile…or form of birth control. Etc..
Specifically, you need to keep track of these things, and all the ones currently online have poor user experience and design. And Andrea wanted to put up something people could use to track this process. And what she created, I decided was it would not work, so I created my own flash application that can do this. And it is the only application that I know of that can do this translated into so many languages. And had to be built in English in the first instance because I cannot develop in Romanian….not about knowing when ovulation, but knowing about your body.
This project is intended to expand and we don’t know how, but it will.
You said you mainly used sketches, but do you ever use wireframes or info design or anything like that?
The irony of it, is that I hate being in front of the computer. But one of my oldest customers who keeps coming back to me…??? but one of my main tools for wireframes was PowerPoint. They could make revisions and drafts without getting me involved. For small changes. If in PowerPoint they can just open it up and change it. Now when I moved to Ubuntu I lost it and open office is lousy. Because of this project and this circumstances, I have started to use Mockflow? Sometimes I do use wireframes and use that program.
I try not to accumulate information because it burdens me. Let the client take care of their materials. I don’t want too much on mind.
What, about your workflow makes it better for you as an individual?
I am not sure I understand?
Is there a specific aspect of your workflow that makes it better for you personally?
I am in an awkward position in life. One of my motivations for doing WP projects I that I need money. One of my frustrations is that I don’t like working for money. I like putting my heart into it. And I will say what I said a couple of minutes ago. I don’t like working in front of computers. I don’t like doing WP projects. I love the fact that doing WP project leverages people’s lives. I like helping my cousin express himself, and if that becomes part of his infrastructure for private practice that is like an amazing privilege for me. If I didn’t need to think about money, and if it wasn’t part of the process, I would just find a Wordpress guy and just concentrate on the process. Help with the process of expressing themselves. There are two posts on my site that help express why I use WP. This is what interests me, not the design process. Not the web design. I like to do the, it is almost a yoga process, the client wants a website, but I want to teach them about purpose because this is what is it is to me. It is your voice. This is the amazing thing about Wordpress, we have been able to teach 15000 women about female anatomy. If I wanted a book I would have never been able to publish it. And this is what I see when I go to a project. And people say web design, and talk about pages, and I say come-one because I know that is not what people want. They have to trust me at first, because they don’t understand what I am talking about. But in retrospect they will get it completely. But nobody hires me for that. People think they know that already. It is not part of the job description. But when somebody hits a wall and say they cannot get through my about me page, is that part of being a web designer? I may not be answering your question, but I am raising questions. But that is the heart not web design of creating an online presence. There is much more to it than installing Wordpress and creating a theme. If you say you are going to have 10 categories, I say, yeah write one post my friend. You have to have at least three posts in each category for it to work. That is 30 posts. That is depressing, that is prescription for writers block. How to take the first steps, in this content and expression process. How to have the freedom to know what is right for me in the future. You sometimes have to go half a year. You cannot predict what people are going to respond to. You have no idea where this is going. If you say you do it is bullshit. But I understand why people bullshit, because you are on a timeline and you are doing a web design project. But that is not what it is about. I am not good at business part of this, but if someone trusts me and I will help them through it. It is really process of discovery and closing it off in any way it’s the wrong reasons, especially for nonprofits is not the way to go.
That was a perfect answer to what I wanted. I wanted a nice summation of ideals…
It’s not I want to make a website, it’s I want to make the world a better place. That is the project. It is not about logo, colors and schedules. That is superficial, you are not delving into things and you see these empty websites. The standing water, it is not flowing it is unhealthy for you. Take the website down if this happens.
There was a great thing on wp tv *link he gave an amazing example, if you are washing machine guy and you want a website, what can you possibly write about, and I acknowledge it and he wrote me back. If he wants a website, and really wants to invest time in it, then there are tons of topics to write about.
Find your niche *WP tv
You can really do good website about anything if you really dig into it.
That is also why I left design, changes should be made for different customers with different needs. Darma and Karma.
I can’t just build a website for you, because I don’t know how, and if I say yes then I am lying to you.
I won’t sell out my piece for anybody…that is me.
Tags: cms, designer views, expert model, Nonprofit, web design, wordpress, workflow
Posted in Transcription | 696 Comments »
Saturday, June 5th, 2010
Interviewee: Peter Cole – 2010-04-27 17.31.13 with petercolesdc
Location: Bristol, UK
Duration: 22 minutes
Date: April 27th 2010
*Both audio and transcription can go online.
Area of expertise or job title:
I suppose my job title would be, well I started out as web designer, but it’s probably grown into web designer to web developer to doing printed media, I change what I call myself really, pretty much just go with creative, and whatever comes after that.
How many years have you been in the web design industry?
Professionally 4+ years, but I have been doing web designer since 2001
Do you work mainly as a freelancer or do you work in-house?
I am actually employed by a company called X In Bristol and do little bits and pieces in my spare time, but its growing more and more, something I am looking at. But yeah I am employed fulltime.
How if at all would you label your web design workflow?
Do you mean process?
Yes.
Well it depends really on what sort of project I am doing, what the time scale is, how much money is involved. Â It depends for little sites; kind of do simple sketching and a few conversations then we just dive into it. For the larger projects there is a lot of research, a lot planning, and a fair bit of red tape. And we are doing some work for an animal charity; there are a lot of people a lot of scientists involved in the projects, a lot of predevelopment stuff.
What % of your projects then use WP?
It depends, more recently quite a lot. It has gotten to a point now where it is being requested. Maybe 6-8 months ago it was here is something we can, it has got quite a nice interface and people would run with that. Last couple of things people have actually requested that I use it. Probably personally about 80%, and in the job 10—15% because we do a lot of in-house stuff that is not suited to that kinda thing.
Is there a type a client that asks for to use WP for more often?
Um again, if you ask me that question in about 6 months time I could give you a better answer. Nonprofits do seem to be quite keen on it, because it is open source, and it aligns with the ethos of nonprofits.
Why in particular do you like wordpress? Or do you?
Yeah I do like using it. Mostly because like I said I started out as a web designer, front end developer and my Php and Jquery skills are limited in so much as putting sites together. I can write a bit of code but nothing so advanced, and WP is designer friendly enough that you can put things together in quite a good way, rather than using something like Drupal or Joomla which is just a bit too much. To step up that.
We can move on to the web site life history. Could you tell me the name of the nonprofit and the type of work they do?
International Gorilla Conservation program which is based in Dem of Congo, Uganda in Africa, and they work primarily with mountain gorillas, but other species as well, and the other locals communities as well. It is a subsidiary of Flora and Fauna. I am consulting with them at the moment regarding their website.
How did you become involved?
Good friend of mine from University is working for them, Flora and Fauna and like I said they requested something through him for Wordpress and he didn’t know how to do that. So being friends and this is what I do for a living, he got in touch with me and asked if I wanted to do it and of course I jumped at the chance because it sounded really cool and that is how I got into it. And now they seem to be asking for more and more stuff.
Workflow start to finish…provided markers…
How many people were involved in the project and what were their roles?
I say dominantly three, there was my contact…in the organization they provided content and gave feedback. A project manager in a way. Another, provided feedback and content, and discussed the design side of the project. All of the design and development was just me. A few other people involved but not really anyone I ever dealt with?
SO the 2 people involved in the project, where they solely responsible for design decisions, or was it done as a committee?
Well, Â part of where the research would come in. We spent quite a bit of time setting goals and figuring out what they wanted to achieve with the site. So after providing content and giving feedback on the design, I kinda ran with, provided some wireframe and mockups and they Okayed that, then I ran with it. I was in contact with both of them 3 or 4 times a week for a 3 or 4 months, so it was a close kind of contact, but I was the only one doing the work.
Could you go through the documentation you used in the project? You mentioned wireframes and such, but was their anything else used?
By documentation do you mean sort of like a style guide? Things like that?
I mean a lot of that was decided in house, and I didn’t really have a lot of hands on style because they had their own way of writing things. Yeah obviously the wireframing which was actually quite quick, because the site is not that large. Maybe 5 or 6 wireframs for the main part of the site, and some visuals then building up. They provided a lot of content up front so I was able to strap it on to the navigation and apply it to how it works. We did a lot of focusing on 5 or 6 areas, as they had before something a bit more sporadic.
When doing the research, what sort of methods did you employ?
It was a small project on a small time scale, and the staff involved were on an entirely different continent, that was kind of difficult, but the research was mainly..I like to read up a lot, especially if I am doing something that I don’t know about, I will spend a weeks on it, on something I have absolutely no knowledge at all, because it helps you make more informed decisions. Yeah in terms of research it wasn’t something I generally do, it is not something that has come up.
After the complete the design, did you do usability or was that something not necessary?
To a certain extent, I mean it was a quite simple site, it was something I would have like to have done, but working on such a small budget with a small group it is quite a hard thing to perform.
Could you tell me a little bit more about the relationship with others in the project?
The main issue of course is working remotely. As good as tools like Basecamp or Skype are, it’s never quite the same as being the same room. I was lucky at the end, I got to go and train them and that was really beneficial, and we ironed out little bits and pieces, but we really did not have that luxury. I guess yeah. We did quite a through email and skype, and using skype to walk through.
Did anything work particularly well in relationship? Not so well?
We got to know each other quite well. Cause we talked quite a lot, and once you have built a relationship with someone, and gel with that person quite well, it helps a lot with second guessing that person??? And it did help that one of my good friends was involved in the project as well. We worked together in the past and working together now. Open collaboration and regular contact is good if you are working remotely. We didn’t’ get to use any face to face tool, is one of many problems.
How did you conclude the project and know your clients needs had been met?
Basically, I hit the deadline, and made…and did training, and that after running through the site with those involved, that was when the project concluded. And going in and tailoring a few things….a couple of days going over things I think that worked quite well.
So you were training them how to use Wordpress then?
Yeah, I wrote them a manual and sent them that a few weeks before and I went over step by step through things. I mean it is quite a simple system to pick it. So I walked them through that.
Were you trying to training people who were specifically in charge of updating the site, or the entire organization?
Training the communication officer who is the sole updater of the site.
How does Wordpress specifically affect your workflow, if you think it does?
I don’t think it does really. I mean I think you need to be a bit logical with the site, especially with large sites, and pick out what is possible and what is not. What would take a lot of work to make it possible. I tend to put a large division between design, user interaction and development in my head cause if you deign something for Wordpress that is not easily possible then you shouldn’t be doing in. It not about getting a square peg in a round hole.
Are there any aspects of your workflow that are specific to nonprofits?
No, not really, I don’t think it is a whole lot different. You are tailoring your work to a specific audience, same as you would anything else. No, I wouldn’t say so.
Do you think WP affects the workflow for the nonprofit client?
Probably, I have seen a lot of in-house systems, not specifically for the nonprofit, but organization and in-house system become dated and very hard to use. Anything that can be used, it doesn’t have to be Wordpress that can streamline the process is a very good thing.
Is there anything about your workflow that is specific to you as an individual?
Probably, working with designers and developers in the past, they all got a different way of approaching things. Cause I have got quite a bit of experience working in teams as opposed to just being a freelancer on my own, I take quite a logical approach to my work, especially more recently bc obviously the more you use it the better you become. Yeah so there is a lot of logic involved a lot of planning things out, and practice and updating the way I do things on a weekly basis, just refining things.
Are there any skills that you have that your team especially values you for?
I suppose, I design and do front end code and those are my main skills…certain codes and the speed at which I can do things now, I can put things together in hours now rather than a couple of weeks.
Do you prefer nonprofoits vs for profit?
Nonprofits are just a better feeling in generally. A better feeling than just making money.
If feels more rewarding to my soul, doing nonprofit work. At the end of the day I have to pay the bills like everyone else. I do enjoy my work and I enjoying doing work for nonprofits.
Tags: designer views, expert model, Nonprofit, ownership, web design, wordpress, workflow
Posted in Transcription | 23 Comments »
Saturday, June 5th, 2010
Interviewee: Ash Goodman
Location: East Coast USA
Duration: 15 minutes –technical difficulties
Date: April 27th 2010
*Transcription and audio recording okay to put online.
Job title area of expertise:
I don’t have a job title, as I am the owner of the company. We are Wordpress specialists.
How many years in the design industry?
Founded company in 2004, and actually started building websites in 2006. Before that it was more of an idea than an actual company.
You work as part of company or do you work as a freelancer or for other short term in house projects?
Well a mixture of both. I build websites for clients with Wordpress, but we also are working on some in house stuff now.
How, if at all would you label your workflow?
Not really sure how to answer that question.
In terms, of, I have been looking at stuff like user-centered design, agile development vs. waterfall workflow etc.
I guess I don’t really label in that way. I am programmer not a designer, and I have designers who work for me so everything I do is based around functionality. The design, everything is designed to work with the functionality desired by the client.
I guess if I were to label it, it would be function first.
What % of your projects use Wordpress then?
Yeah 100% of them for 2 years now.
Is there a type of client that comes to you more often?
Hmm. That is a good question. I have seen some changes in that over the years. The type of clientele and changes is mostly geographical. In terms of type of clientele it is mostly small to midsize, whether business or nonprofit. I have done a few larger corporations and did not enjoy the experience, so I tend to avoid such projects.
Why in particular did you choose to use Wordpress?
It is better to masters of one thing, than be a jack of all trades. I wanted to find something I could really concentrate on and be the best at. A niche. The last version of Wordpress had 5 million downloads considering that the majority of that is downloaded by developers like myself, and they install multiple websites, there is probably something in the order of 15-20 million websites built on Wordpress in each development cycle. SO it is a pretty big niche. But it is a niche that is not very well served. Most of the Wp developers out there know how to install Wordpress and some minor customization and functionality and know how to make a design and install plug-ins. What we do is a bit different, we have actually created our own framework for Wordpress and we can make it do just about anything really. People come to us when they need something that can’t get out of the box.
We can go ahead and move on to nonprofit website life history, could you tell me the name of the nonprofit and the sort of work they do?
*conversation cut out for first time here
There is a lot of misinformation about Wordpress, a lot of people say it is better with search engine optimization, no CMS is more or less secure or more less better for SEO it really comes down to how it is used and how it is setup. I could have easily used something like Joomla or Drupal, I think the big attraction for me with Wordpress is that I already had some familiarity with it; it was something that I see as an underserved market. There are a lot of WP specialists out there but very few of them actually understand how WP is put together to be able to modify the way it functions. They are able to install plugins and change the way it looks, but not really able to go in an change the way in functions. SO that is an area where I thought I could come in and offer something new.
……
Delay in speech….checking settings….
It was a preschool called Little windmills I think located in Cambridge. Â And what it is a woman named Joan X and she has a marketing company and she trying to branch out and do web design, kind find someone to white label for her. And that was the first project that we did. And it was for the preschool, and it was done just a little above cost. Pretty much at a break even cost.
How did you get in touch, or how did they find you?
I did some work for a company her husband worked for.
I would like to hear about workflow for this site from start to finish. Do you feel comfortable speaking fluidly about the process? Or would prefer that I provide markers?
Yeah, it is pretty straightforward thing. We started out gathering the facts getting feel for what the client’s goals and needs were, and we didn’t just do that by having them fill out a form, but we have a conversation, we ask questions and explore to get an idea of what they are looking for. Once we have an idea of that, we actually issue the quotation. When everything is agreed upon we start the work process, and its starts out with handing a brief to the artist that work for me and explain some what the functionality is we are looking for and what design parameters are, if we have an example site of things they like and don’t’ like, we will be looking at those things as well. Keeping in mind any color schemes or things they may want. For example I had one client who was just passionate about polka dots. And the website had to have polka dots included in the design.
And then we go into the design stage, and this where the biggest, for us, amount of cost in a project goes, because we have already developed our own in house framework and a lot of the heavy lifting code wise is already done, so for design our basic design package is prob what we use for 90%Â of our clientele, nonprofit or not, is just 3 designs for them and they pick the design they prefer, which may be a mix and match scenario, and take that for a design and fine tune it and get to an end result they are happy with. At that point the design becomes frozen, once they have indicated that they are happy with it and that is the final design and then we convert it to a Wp theme.
Could you tell me more about type of research done to get to know the client better?
Research is probably too heavy of a word. I mean we are not really dealing with big corporate projects, if we were doing stuff like that we would probably do more time on research. Really what we do is listening and asking questions.
*maybe a good reason to volunteer with clients for at least a few days to get an idea of what their organization is like, if there is not time to do research?
I get on the phone, and most of business comes from online so we tend to do everything online rather than on phone or in person. I won’t take on a contract if I have not spoken to the client. There is just no way to know what they need otherwise if I have not spoken to the person. One 30 minute phone call, I have an idea of what the client wants rather than hours spent on back and forth in email. So really question-answer scenario and I start out having them tell me a bit about what they are doing and a bit about their business. And understanding of the nature of the services or goods of whatever they do. And then down to want they want to achieve. And the hard part is not really getting them to talk about it, it’s in interpreting it.
*two opposing systems
Because of course they do not understand the terminology we use, they say one thing meaning something else and to use it means something entire different. The translation process is really where the biggest part of it goes. Listening and ask questions, and explore. They tell me they want to thing A, and I will ask a few questions about that. And I’ll ask about thing B and thing C that might be similar but different to see if that is really what they are aiming for. And as we go through we get a more focused view of what they are actually looking for and of course we will usually uncover several different hidden needs. Things they need, but didn’t know to ask for.  Things they might have assumed would be included, but are not necessarily included. Things like that. So it’s more along those lines, we don’t necessarily do research per-say, but if a plumber comes to me for a website, I am not going to do research on the plumbing industry.
*note: other interviewee said the exact opposite about plumbers
When you are speaking to clients do you translate technical terms or do you translate what things mean?
A mixture of both, it really depends on the client. My whole development philosophy in terms of building websites is that and this is why I use CMS like Wordpress, is that someone should be able to manage your website. It is an integral part of your business. Part of your marketing efforts and you should not have to hire someone to mange it for you. Granted, if you are fortune 500 company you can do that. But if you are the mom and pop restaurant you can’t hire someone to manage your website, you need to be able to do it yourself. And WP and any other system, none of them are really intuitive or easy to use out of the box; they are all kind of built with the idea that the user has more idea of how things work than they actually do. So a lot of what we do in development is simplifying that process, and reducing it to a point and click type of thing making it very easy for them to use and I think that is kinda.. And so when I am educating them or translating it for them it is with that in mind, that they should not have to know to know as much as I know. They should not have to know the language as long as we can use one term and mean the same thing that I all I really aim for. For example when they refer to the sidebar, but that might be called several things with different clients.
*should not have to know as much as I know…yes. Then are content management systems creating the opportunity to allow users to take on tasks without such knowledge?
How many people are usually involved in your projects then?
On your side?
Connection cut out….
Normally myself and then I have someone handle layout and one or two artist.
How many people were involved in approving designs on preschool side?
I don’t actually know how many people were involved because going through agency.
It was definitely a committee thing from them. There were probably 4 or 5 people.
I tend to avoid dealing with anymore than one person. I don’t let my clients make decisions by committees. I will not talk to committees. It adds so much time and complexity to any given project. I generally insist there is one point of contact, someone who has the authority to make decisions whether they wish to discuss the decisions with the other individuals involved is up to them. But it is just me and that one person.
Connection cut out….
What are the major documentation markers where you usually seek approval from client?
What documentation is used in terms of wireframe etc..
Oh no, we don’t do wireframes because we not dealing with big corporate contracts. Our clients do not have the budget to afford a lengthy drawn out process like that. Our typical website starts about 700 or 800 pounds, to the upper ranger 2000 and up. If you want to talk about wireframing you are talking about 10,000 pound and up contracts…
Connection cut out….
Tags: cms, designer views, expert model, Nonprofit, relationship technology user, web design, workflow
Posted in Transcription | 658 Comments »
Saturday, June 5th, 2010
Date of Event: June 1, 2010
What: NetSquared London – June: CiviCRM http://civicrm.org/
Who: Michael McAndrew
Where: St Ethelburga’s Centre for Reconciliation and Peace
What happened:
Tonight’s Meetup topic was CiviCRM. I will let you read their website description below.
CiviCRM: A Free and Open Source eCRM Solution
“CiviCRM is a free, libre and open source constituent relationship management solution. CiviCRM is web-based, internationalized, and designed specifically to meet the needs of advocacy, non-profit and non-governmental groups.
CiviCRM is a powerful contact, fundraising and eCRM system that allows you to record and manage information about your various constituents including volunteers, activists, donors, employees, clients, vendors, etc. Track and execute donations, transactions, conversations, events or any type of correspondence with each constituent and store it all in one, easily accessible and manageable source.
CiviCRM is created by an open source community coordinated by CiviCRM LLC, and the 501c3 non-profit Social Source Foundation. The project also receives ongoing input and guidance from our Community Advisory Board.â€
———————————————————————————————–
Turned out to be a great meeting to attend, as the majority of people present were involved in the nonprofit sector as technology professionals looking to improve processes within their own organizations.
Two such people, in charge of revamping and maintaining their nonprofit’s online presence, were also having trouble convincing colleagues to actually use the technology that would allow forward movement. Describing them as “technophobesâ€, who also prefer not to use email for planning etc., the people in the organization simply are not (and apparently do not want to be) exposed to a lot of technology. Sticking with what is comfortable for them, a lot of issues have also stemmed from the transfer of print information to the web.  If one is not familiar the Internet, content can easily be seen as a static entity, whereas in most circumstances it does need to be altered for a specific context. Thus when the content does need to be put online, it is being given to the “tech professional†to handle, a person that may not understand its history and therefore changes made for the web may not reflect its initial intent. Not a very collaborative process, but also not collaborative because the technology is not viewed as being made for collaboration. As one person said: “technology is seen as for a professional to handleâ€.
Due to the speed of the industry, not having updated their site recently also usually means a more dramatic change and learning curve. However, constant revision is not feasible for many nonprofits. With a minimal budget for in-house tech people or out-sourcing, the need for systems that can take care of the basic tasks themselves seems to be necessary as a money saving option. And if this means using a CMS, this also breaks down the tech hierarchy. If there is an in-house tech, this person can also then work on increasing functionality, rather than worrying about small content changes etc.
During the presentation, this topic was also more generally discussed in terms of the positive impact that technology can have on an organization. However, with slower iterations and integration of new technologies tending to work better for nonprofits because it gives them a chance to adapt. For many technologies just stay very abstract until being used for the first time. Something that may also be more common for nonprofits as larger corporations appear to either not take the time to allow people to adapt, or already have someone who knows what to do. Â St.Ethelburgas, an excellent case study for CiviCRM, was successful because they had a group of people who were technologically minded and/or were open to the possible improvements that new technology could offer.
Oy. Okay. Interesting note about CiviCRM: It was designed to fit the needs of the nonprofit user. I would like to know how they went about deciphering nonprofit needs, what generalizations were made and what feedback CiviCRM have received in reference to how correct they were in defining the nonprofit user.
One of those needs is low cost solutions, but a good clarification that Michael brought up was that “free and open source†may not be clear to all individuals. While the software is free, it must be understood that if you are not a tech expert, you probably will need to pay to hire someone to set the software up.
Links to check out: Nten- http://www.nten.org/2009_ecosystem_report
NTEN aspires to a world where all nonprofit organizations skillfully and confidently use technology to meet community needs and fulfill their missions.
Tags: designer views, expert model, Nonprofit, ownership, relationship technology user, workflow
Posted in Meetups | 71 Comments »
Monday, May 31st, 2010
Date of Event: May 27, 2010
What: CMS Meetup Group
Who: The Last Thursday CMS Meetup
Where: Hoxton Hotel
What happened:
This evening was Meetup.com’s Last Thursday Group which concentrates on Content Management Systems. So of course I went along to see what people thought about Wordpress and a bit about using it with nonprofits. Got a lot of good feedback, however I think my slightly too large yellow notebook was a bit daunting. Need to switch to my smaller Rhodia pad. Anyway, just a note to myself.
Listing major pieces of information rather than writing in narrative fashion due to the amount of information received.
Blog vs. CMS: A few people noted Wordpress’ blogging emphasis, but also did understand its capabilities for a full CMS and with the right alterations is able to handle a variety of tasks. This has not been the case in other circumstances, where it was only known as a blogging platform.
Relationship between software and user: It had not occurred to me that not having to buy Wordpress as a product also changes the relationship between the technology and the organization as user or consumer. The exchange value is shifted and the organization using the open source software (usually) understands the “agreement†they are entering into. No longer are they able to be dependent on a third party for any software related problems, but they also have to take initiative to find their own solutions or find someone who can.  Not sure if this just causes organizations to be dependent on the web designer as the solution, or if organizations would take the opportunity to value Wordpress as something that needs to be used in their everyday processes. It is also true that many organizations needing websites do not necessarily play a large role in choosing their software, but rather go with whatever the web designer uses or suggests. Still there is a separation in the fact that the organization does not have to deal with the ties attached to proprietary software.
Wordpress popularity: I asked whether or not the popularity of Wordpress is changing the nature of content management systems as a whole, and the answer I received was negative. While the ease of use of WP is quite commendable, more change is happening within the software itself as its user base continues to build. Other CMSs may be more complicated, but  they do have their uses and benefits.
Wordpress restrictions: On that note, I have also heard a few people mention now that Wordpress does not handle a high volume of visitors. Not something I will have to worry about, but something still to keep in mind. I was told it has a lot to do with the number of plug-ins and changing the caching system.
Wordpress functionality: A lot people appear to be mentioning comparisons between other blogging software and Wordpress and that WP has many more options and functionality. I wonder how much of this is that people in the design industry want more functionality because they know what can be done, or if users as a whole are starting to want more options in their online projects.
Wordpress and nonprofits: Again, when asked what aspects of Wordpress are suitable for nonprofits…mentioned was that fact that it is free, the backend is easy to use and its features and plug-ins are nice additions to have for nonprofits. Some other reasons were that templates and its base are compliant, which takes away time consuming basic work that needs to be done.  I also asked if nonprofits often choose WP because of open source ideals, but everyone seemed to agree it was really just because it is free.
Ownership: Another interesting point that was brought up is that organizations like, and possibly need, to take ownership of their web presence. Open source and free software allows one to do this. If you can do what you please with Wordpress, because of its licensing then it also becomes a very appealing option. Larger businesses however, that have the money to spend on web development, appear to believe that free products are not to be trusted. I suppose then as nonprofits do not have an option, it does not become an issue. A good example the participants gave was Google Analytics, which is said to be the best tool in the industry of its kind, yet no larger business will use it, because it is free and therefore not trusted.
Investment: I also asked if giving clients the ability to update their own content provides people with some incentive to continue to update the site. The two people I was speaking to simultaneously shook their heads and said it really depends on the client. In their experience technology, or content management systems, while they did allow for greater interaction between the client and website, were only successful in certain contexts because the client really needed to want to use the software. That there is still the view that technology is to be taken care of by professionals and is not the job of the client. I wonder then if this attitude is more prevalent in the business rather than nonprofit arena, where again nonprofits may have to take on such tasks themselves.
Hierarchy: Continuing on that point, it was stated that a lot of the companies who do not want to update their own website, have a lot of hierarchy within the business. Bureaucracy simply gets in the way as content needs to be approved or posted and ends up being easier for a single person to take care of the task. While this makes sense and job roles do need to be assigned in larger corporation, I suppose it also limits input from a variety of viewpoints. In terms of my research, I will also need to make some sort of distinction between organizations that do have an in-house person to do website updating, vs. the outsourcing of a web designer that provides them with a CMS.
UCD: Another important distinction brought up was the utilization of UCD in the process of building software such as Wordpress vs. the utilization of UCD during actual site construction using Wordpress. So while I am looking at the user experience of Wordpress with nonprofits, I am not looking directly into what changes need to be made to make it more usable for nonprofits. I was surprised to hear that UCD really does not come in very much during the development of software. Wordpress then is probably slightly more popular because it has gone through many iterations and usability testing has been an aspect of this process. The Wordpress CMS is like a website that people need to be able to use, so it is understandable that the backend interface would have been tested.
Twitter: I was convinced to get a Twitter account during this meeting as I was told it is quite easy to search for Wordpress solutions and tips when you are having issues. Follow me if you please @kristinakek. Ugh.
Tags: cms, designer views, expert model, Nonprofit, ownership, relationship technology user, ucd, wordpress, workflow
Posted in Meetups | 57 Comments »
Monday, May 24th, 2010
Date of event: May 20, 2010
What: LONDON WEB – Top 10 UX Gotchas, Conference learnings & Traffic kickstarts
Who: The London Web Meetup
Where: Hoxton Apprentice – Restaurant & Bar
What happened:
Tonight I arrived at the Meetup in lovely Hoxton. The topic was UX (User Experience) and it happened to be an excellent compliment to an earlier interview in the day with a user-centered designer (but I will talk more about that below). As with previous Meetups everyone was incredibly welcoming and I had a great time conversing with the good number of people that attended.
The night began with a speaker who works as a UX designer at Google, George Zafirovski (http://giizii.com/ – a good collection of links on his site) who spoke about the top 10 UX Gotchas he had compiled through emails with colleagues and his own experiences. He began however with a definition of the numerous job titles and roles that people play in the UX field. Titles that many people in the room stated they were confused by, one person being brave enough to ask, but again George Zafirovski had also already predicted the need for explanation and had a PowerPoint ready to do so.
Link to slide-show: http://www.scribd.com/doc/31987290/Top-10-UX-Gotchas
Here are the job roles he listed:
- User Experience Designer: UXD – Designs the visual concepts and ideas using software to create.
- User Experience Researcher: UER – Does cognitive walk-throughs, reassessment of existing products or on prototypes.
- Interaction Designers: ID – Creates protypes in HTML and Javascript etc…
- Mobile Designers: MD – Designs for mobiles.
- Web Developers: WD – Production of code for prototypes.
- Front End Engineer: SWE? – Production of code, using Javascript, Python etc… to develop frameworks.
All of whom are responsible for user-experience and advised to remember “Focus on the user and all else will followâ€. He stated that Google itself uses Agile development for its products, a fast paced and iterative process that keeps projects open and flexible. And that many of their ideas come from their own innovation, proceeding later on to user testing and such. A mix, rather than a linear progression of project management, UX and engineering as shown by his PowerPoint Venn diagram.
Onto the “Top 10 UX Gotchasâ€.
They are (with a few of his side comments):
1. I skipped the wireframes and produced hi-fi mock-ups instead. – Iterations are needed along with feedback or the user suffers.
2. We don’t have time to test it.
3. Just make it a setting. – Too many options cause disorganization and user confusion.
4. We only want to test it with savvy users. – Who and what is a tech savvy user?
5. We’ll let the translator worry about that. – Localization is necessary.
6. We’ll launch this and then figure out how real people use it. – People just get frustrated.
7. We’ll fix it in version two.
8. The target user is a late 20’s tech professional. – Who is this person? Is this person the same no matter where they are located? Probably not.
9. If you build it, they will come. – Who are you developing for?
10. Who is this for? – The world is huge. Ask users what they want and iterate, keeping them involved throughout the entire process.
All of these points received a knowing laugh the majority of people in the room. Most people cited time and money as the reason for committing these errors, but I also wonder how much stems from workflow standards that need to be unlearned.
In the Q&A session the speaker noted that there can be too great of variety in a user for one really to create a single persona or user group. In fact many users of Google products are in fact too vast, which is why they keep open online discussions for feedback and bug reporting. A smaller version of which I hope to integrate into my nonprofit project.
Another person asked: What about commercial viability? Where does making money come into the process? A good question considering the message of UX seems to be only about the users’ needs, and not about how to balance them with making money. The question was not answered solidly, as it appeared to be somewhat irrelevant in Google’s context. Small businesses definitely do not have the same marketing and structural benefits as such a large organization and thus are not able to take the same risks and time in development.
Finally I asked “Does User-centered design fit in as all encompassing of what you have just spoken about, or a separate but related field?†The speaker was confused by the question, and I was confused by his answer, so I spoke to him after the talk. From further discussion, it appears that the term user-centered design can be used to describe anything that is user-centered, rather than a field in itself. User-experience design however, as stated above, contains a number of players that make-up an entire process.
What I thought about it:
The most interesting aspect for me in this event was the continuation of confusion over the the individual roles within UX. The interview I had earlier in the day stated that job titles and skill-sets were also being confused and lumped together by clients. This leaving the project managers etc. to figure out what exactly their clients were looking for and who they needed to hire externally to get the job done. Which continues to support the feedback I am receiving about workflows: that in the design industry most people really just build up a personal process or workflow that works for them and achieves the desired goal, with really no strict procedure to follow.
Additionally, to hear the speaker at this Meetup not acknowledge the existence of UCD as a separate field or use the term at all was quite different from my research thus far. Again, they seem to point in the same direction, as the interviewee used them interchangeably and both the interviewee and speaker used documentation, such as personas and journeys to better understand the user. I have to say I am still slightly in the dark about where things separate and overlap ( i.e. I thought user-centered design was a workflow, just as agile development is a workflow, but apparently they are often combined).
It appears that user-centered design is sort of a catch all for people and can be said to be in effect at any point in the design process, with a history in such things as ergonomics and non-internet related technology. User-experience on the other hand seems be directed more often at online work or web design. As both contain the same job roles, it may simply be that UX is taking over as the buzzword for the web world. Researching now….
Any comments on what you believe to be the main differences certainly welcome.
Tags: designer views, expert model, ucd, user experience, workflow
Posted in Meetups | 726 Comments »
|
Applied Anthropology and Design is proudly powered by WordPress 2.9.2
|
|