Monday, June 7th, 2010
Date of Event: June 3, 2010
What: Apps for Good London by CDI Europe: Monthly Networking Drinks
Who: Apps for Good : http://appsforgood.org/
Where: Las Iguanas – Spitalfields Market
What happened:
Tonight I attended the Meetup Group: Apps for Good. An amazing organization that does this:
Apps for Good is the new programme by CDI Europe where young people learn to create apps that change their world. During April/ May 2010 we will be running the first prototype course at the High Trees Development Trust in Tulse Hill/South London and envision to expand to four other locations in the UK by the end of the year. And Rodrigo Baggio, CDI’s founder, wants to see 50 CDI Community Centres in the UK by the end of 2011…
Quite impressive I must say, with a great following of people helping to get the project off the ground.
Received quite a bit of good information, apologies for the disjointed thought process, but going to note point by point:
-       Language: A small conversation began surrounding the fact that: “Language is impreciseâ€. Often, for successful interdisciplinary communication, or in this case client-designer communication, participants either need to use language that resides in one of the opposing systems or to find a point of convergence that allows for more fluid understanding. To what level then are web designers responsible for educating their clients?
-       Terminology: The term “emerging markets†was used at some point in the evening and appears to be quite popular in the web industry. I realize that the world is yet to find a term that not relative to the USA, Britain etc… but better suited would be a term that does not directly imply a move toward the capitalist market system.  I am certainly not against the use of technology in populations where there is less exposure, but it would be preferred that technology be developed as a result of research done for a specific location and need rather than imposed.
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Agile Definition: Another definition of Agile development for comparison: reducing risk for a project and letting client and others know that changes are allow. Reducing stress as a whole. Setting priority at certain junctions, but being flexible.
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Nonprofit Web Designer: Spoke to my first female web designer! And she was fantastic. A large portion of what was spoken about had to do accessibility and a comparison between her work with larger corporations and nonprofits. For larger corporations would not make their site accessible until they knew that the time put into such a task would also increase their revenue. Therefore, until this was assured and had moved through the hierarchy to be approved by all the correct individuals, nothing could be done by her as the web designer. And of course in the end, greater accessibility does mean great revenue. Nonprofits on the other hand, do not usually have the same hierarchy that would limit web designers from making the site accessible, they normally want an accessible site because it fits with their ideals (Digital Inclusion) and generally there is just greater need to reach as many people as possible. It was also for this reason that working with nonprofits was a positive experience for her. Being allowed more freedom, but being driven by the ideals of the nonprofit makes the process of web design more pleasant. Not to mention, that when working with a nonprofit often times any labor time that you can donate is appreciated whether or not you able to create exactly what planned.
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Wordpress and Nonprofits: This web designer stated she also uses Wordpress because it is just best looking and easiest thing to get up and running. A common statement for sure among web designers. Following, CMSs are useful because themes are built to be compliant, again allowing an organization to reach more people across platforms. She stated without following set standards, communication eventually does break down.
-       Documentation: For particular nonprofit sites, she did go through some processes of wireframing, but alterations in templates are relatively easy to make as well. Previous web designers have also stated that they bypass a lot of documentation because Wordpress’ basic installation allows one to organize content easily before implementing the theme.
-       Nonprofits + Agencies: She has seen nonprofits go to agencies for websites and what is given to them is a cookie-cutter site that is fast and easy for the agency, but lacks commitment to the nonprofit’s cause or needs.
-       New App: Also found out that there has been an app developed that automatically makes websites accessible and works with variety of screen readers etc… thus relieving lazy web designers of the work it takes to make the site accessible. Link anyone?
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Open Source: I also asked at this Meetup whether they agreed that a lot of corporations distrust free software and there was blanket disagreement. This is in opposition to the answer I received previously. Both groups of people were developers and designers. The group agreeing were individuals involved in the creation of an open source CMS, the group disagreeing were quite mixed. Not sure.
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Value Chain: One member of the Meetup also brought up an interesting point about where people and data fall in the value chain. It is not until someone is able to make use of data, to build an app etc., that the data actually becomes valuable. It has then been given a use-value that can be exchanged at an entirely different level and possible even for something it was not intended for. *Would be interesting delve deeper into the movement of data through the market.
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Sustainability of technology: The same member also stated he is facing the issue of how to make technology sustainable and accessible in order to allow continued use of the data gathered by his organization. If funding is cut, then technology must be easy to use and maintainable by the greater community. Â In replacing community with nonprofit, the same value applies. How can web designers implement a sustainable technology that allows nonprofits to maintain their website (their data and information) cheaply and easily? To provide ownership?
-       CDI: The goal of CDI is was my initial goal when attempting to figure out my research project. To find an issue and then use technology to solve it. In the end, my current project was more feasible, as I do not have the technological expertise to build the necessary app., plug-in, software etc. In my master’s next year in Human Centered Design and Engineering I will have a chance to work in a group where everyone has a different skill set to bring to the table. Making such a project possible.
Points I am not sure what to do with quite yet:
-       One of the participants stated that, “technologists simply learn to fix problems that they create themselvesâ€. I realize this cannot be taken at face value, but does remind us that user needs, while currently often in the forefront, are not the only factor driving innovation.
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Work acceptance? The meaning of this is on the tip of my tongue. I know it was explained. Anybody help me out? Roles of client and designer? Is it relating to scope creep?
Links to check out:
CDI – http://cdieurope.eu/
Our mission is to transform lives and strengthen low-income communities by empowering people with information and communication technology.
http://www.itforcharities.co.uk/
IT resource guide for charities.
To be “The UK organisation that has the most impact on how Civil Society organisations can exploit the technology resources they need to improve their effectiveness, achieve their aims and, in turn, improve the lives of the people they serveâ€.
http://mulqueeny.wordpress.com/
Bio Co-Founder Rewired State & government-y type person. Sadly passionate about: Transformational Govnt, Smarter Govnt, Data, Power of information, Geeks.
Rewired State runs hackdays where developers show government what is possible, and government shows developers what is needed.
http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/
Ordnance Survey is Great Britain’s national mapping agency, providing the most accurate and up-to-date geographic data, relied on by government, business and individuals.
CMS/website publishing software
Tags: cms, designer views, expert model, Nonprofit, ownership, relationship technology user, ucd, web design, wordpress, workflow
Posted in Meetups | 165 Comments »
Saturday, June 5th, 2010
Interviewee: Peter Cole – 2010-04-27 17.31.13 with petercolesdc
Location: Bristol, UK
Duration: 22 minutes
Date: April 27th 2010
*Both audio and transcription can go online.
Area of expertise or job title:
I suppose my job title would be, well I started out as web designer, but it’s probably grown into web designer to web developer to doing printed media, I change what I call myself really, pretty much just go with creative, and whatever comes after that.
How many years have you been in the web design industry?
Professionally 4+ years, but I have been doing web designer since 2001
Do you work mainly as a freelancer or do you work in-house?
I am actually employed by a company called X In Bristol and do little bits and pieces in my spare time, but its growing more and more, something I am looking at. But yeah I am employed fulltime.
How if at all would you label your web design workflow?
Do you mean process?
Yes.
Well it depends really on what sort of project I am doing, what the time scale is, how much money is involved. Â It depends for little sites; kind of do simple sketching and a few conversations then we just dive into it. For the larger projects there is a lot of research, a lot planning, and a fair bit of red tape. And we are doing some work for an animal charity; there are a lot of people a lot of scientists involved in the projects, a lot of predevelopment stuff.
What % of your projects then use WP?
It depends, more recently quite a lot. It has gotten to a point now where it is being requested. Maybe 6-8 months ago it was here is something we can, it has got quite a nice interface and people would run with that. Last couple of things people have actually requested that I use it. Probably personally about 80%, and in the job 10—15% because we do a lot of in-house stuff that is not suited to that kinda thing.
Is there a type a client that asks for to use WP for more often?
Um again, if you ask me that question in about 6 months time I could give you a better answer. Nonprofits do seem to be quite keen on it, because it is open source, and it aligns with the ethos of nonprofits.
Why in particular do you like wordpress? Or do you?
Yeah I do like using it. Mostly because like I said I started out as a web designer, front end developer and my Php and Jquery skills are limited in so much as putting sites together. I can write a bit of code but nothing so advanced, and WP is designer friendly enough that you can put things together in quite a good way, rather than using something like Drupal or Joomla which is just a bit too much. To step up that.
We can move on to the web site life history. Could you tell me the name of the nonprofit and the type of work they do?
International Gorilla Conservation program which is based in Dem of Congo, Uganda in Africa, and they work primarily with mountain gorillas, but other species as well, and the other locals communities as well. It is a subsidiary of Flora and Fauna. I am consulting with them at the moment regarding their website.
How did you become involved?
Good friend of mine from University is working for them, Flora and Fauna and like I said they requested something through him for Wordpress and he didn’t know how to do that. So being friends and this is what I do for a living, he got in touch with me and asked if I wanted to do it and of course I jumped at the chance because it sounded really cool and that is how I got into it. And now they seem to be asking for more and more stuff.
Workflow start to finish…provided markers…
How many people were involved in the project and what were their roles?
I say dominantly three, there was my contact…in the organization they provided content and gave feedback. A project manager in a way. Another, provided feedback and content, and discussed the design side of the project. All of the design and development was just me. A few other people involved but not really anyone I ever dealt with?
SO the 2 people involved in the project, where they solely responsible for design decisions, or was it done as a committee?
Well, Â part of where the research would come in. We spent quite a bit of time setting goals and figuring out what they wanted to achieve with the site. So after providing content and giving feedback on the design, I kinda ran with, provided some wireframe and mockups and they Okayed that, then I ran with it. I was in contact with both of them 3 or 4 times a week for a 3 or 4 months, so it was a close kind of contact, but I was the only one doing the work.
Could you go through the documentation you used in the project? You mentioned wireframes and such, but was their anything else used?
By documentation do you mean sort of like a style guide? Things like that?
I mean a lot of that was decided in house, and I didn’t really have a lot of hands on style because they had their own way of writing things. Yeah obviously the wireframing which was actually quite quick, because the site is not that large. Maybe 5 or 6 wireframs for the main part of the site, and some visuals then building up. They provided a lot of content up front so I was able to strap it on to the navigation and apply it to how it works. We did a lot of focusing on 5 or 6 areas, as they had before something a bit more sporadic.
When doing the research, what sort of methods did you employ?
It was a small project on a small time scale, and the staff involved were on an entirely different continent, that was kind of difficult, but the research was mainly..I like to read up a lot, especially if I am doing something that I don’t know about, I will spend a weeks on it, on something I have absolutely no knowledge at all, because it helps you make more informed decisions. Yeah in terms of research it wasn’t something I generally do, it is not something that has come up.
After the complete the design, did you do usability or was that something not necessary?
To a certain extent, I mean it was a quite simple site, it was something I would have like to have done, but working on such a small budget with a small group it is quite a hard thing to perform.
Could you tell me a little bit more about the relationship with others in the project?
The main issue of course is working remotely. As good as tools like Basecamp or Skype are, it’s never quite the same as being the same room. I was lucky at the end, I got to go and train them and that was really beneficial, and we ironed out little bits and pieces, but we really did not have that luxury. I guess yeah. We did quite a through email and skype, and using skype to walk through.
Did anything work particularly well in relationship? Not so well?
We got to know each other quite well. Cause we talked quite a lot, and once you have built a relationship with someone, and gel with that person quite well, it helps a lot with second guessing that person??? And it did help that one of my good friends was involved in the project as well. We worked together in the past and working together now. Open collaboration and regular contact is good if you are working remotely. We didn’t’ get to use any face to face tool, is one of many problems.
How did you conclude the project and know your clients needs had been met?
Basically, I hit the deadline, and made…and did training, and that after running through the site with those involved, that was when the project concluded. And going in and tailoring a few things….a couple of days going over things I think that worked quite well.
So you were training them how to use Wordpress then?
Yeah, I wrote them a manual and sent them that a few weeks before and I went over step by step through things. I mean it is quite a simple system to pick it. So I walked them through that.
Were you trying to training people who were specifically in charge of updating the site, or the entire organization?
Training the communication officer who is the sole updater of the site.
How does Wordpress specifically affect your workflow, if you think it does?
I don’t think it does really. I mean I think you need to be a bit logical with the site, especially with large sites, and pick out what is possible and what is not. What would take a lot of work to make it possible. I tend to put a large division between design, user interaction and development in my head cause if you deign something for Wordpress that is not easily possible then you shouldn’t be doing in. It not about getting a square peg in a round hole.
Are there any aspects of your workflow that are specific to nonprofits?
No, not really, I don’t think it is a whole lot different. You are tailoring your work to a specific audience, same as you would anything else. No, I wouldn’t say so.
Do you think WP affects the workflow for the nonprofit client?
Probably, I have seen a lot of in-house systems, not specifically for the nonprofit, but organization and in-house system become dated and very hard to use. Anything that can be used, it doesn’t have to be Wordpress that can streamline the process is a very good thing.
Is there anything about your workflow that is specific to you as an individual?
Probably, working with designers and developers in the past, they all got a different way of approaching things. Cause I have got quite a bit of experience working in teams as opposed to just being a freelancer on my own, I take quite a logical approach to my work, especially more recently bc obviously the more you use it the better you become. Yeah so there is a lot of logic involved a lot of planning things out, and practice and updating the way I do things on a weekly basis, just refining things.
Are there any skills that you have that your team especially values you for?
I suppose, I design and do front end code and those are my main skills…certain codes and the speed at which I can do things now, I can put things together in hours now rather than a couple of weeks.
Do you prefer nonprofoits vs for profit?
Nonprofits are just a better feeling in generally. A better feeling than just making money.
If feels more rewarding to my soul, doing nonprofit work. At the end of the day I have to pay the bills like everyone else. I do enjoy my work and I enjoying doing work for nonprofits.
Tags: designer views, expert model, Nonprofit, ownership, web design, wordpress, workflow
Posted in Transcription | 23 Comments »
Saturday, June 5th, 2010
Date of Event: June 1, 2010
What: NetSquared London – June: CiviCRM http://civicrm.org/
Who: Michael McAndrew
Where: St Ethelburga’s Centre for Reconciliation and Peace
What happened:
Tonight’s Meetup topic was CiviCRM. I will let you read their website description below.
CiviCRM: A Free and Open Source eCRM Solution
“CiviCRM is a free, libre and open source constituent relationship management solution. CiviCRM is web-based, internationalized, and designed specifically to meet the needs of advocacy, non-profit and non-governmental groups.
CiviCRM is a powerful contact, fundraising and eCRM system that allows you to record and manage information about your various constituents including volunteers, activists, donors, employees, clients, vendors, etc. Track and execute donations, transactions, conversations, events or any type of correspondence with each constituent and store it all in one, easily accessible and manageable source.
CiviCRM is created by an open source community coordinated by CiviCRM LLC, and the 501c3 non-profit Social Source Foundation. The project also receives ongoing input and guidance from our Community Advisory Board.â€
———————————————————————————————–
Turned out to be a great meeting to attend, as the majority of people present were involved in the nonprofit sector as technology professionals looking to improve processes within their own organizations.
Two such people, in charge of revamping and maintaining their nonprofit’s online presence, were also having trouble convincing colleagues to actually use the technology that would allow forward movement. Describing them as “technophobesâ€, who also prefer not to use email for planning etc., the people in the organization simply are not (and apparently do not want to be) exposed to a lot of technology. Sticking with what is comfortable for them, a lot of issues have also stemmed from the transfer of print information to the web.  If one is not familiar the Internet, content can easily be seen as a static entity, whereas in most circumstances it does need to be altered for a specific context. Thus when the content does need to be put online, it is being given to the “tech professional†to handle, a person that may not understand its history and therefore changes made for the web may not reflect its initial intent. Not a very collaborative process, but also not collaborative because the technology is not viewed as being made for collaboration. As one person said: “technology is seen as for a professional to handleâ€.
Due to the speed of the industry, not having updated their site recently also usually means a more dramatic change and learning curve. However, constant revision is not feasible for many nonprofits. With a minimal budget for in-house tech people or out-sourcing, the need for systems that can take care of the basic tasks themselves seems to be necessary as a money saving option. And if this means using a CMS, this also breaks down the tech hierarchy. If there is an in-house tech, this person can also then work on increasing functionality, rather than worrying about small content changes etc.
During the presentation, this topic was also more generally discussed in terms of the positive impact that technology can have on an organization. However, with slower iterations and integration of new technologies tending to work better for nonprofits because it gives them a chance to adapt. For many technologies just stay very abstract until being used for the first time. Something that may also be more common for nonprofits as larger corporations appear to either not take the time to allow people to adapt, or already have someone who knows what to do. Â St.Ethelburgas, an excellent case study for CiviCRM, was successful because they had a group of people who were technologically minded and/or were open to the possible improvements that new technology could offer.
Oy. Okay. Interesting note about CiviCRM: It was designed to fit the needs of the nonprofit user. I would like to know how they went about deciphering nonprofit needs, what generalizations were made and what feedback CiviCRM have received in reference to how correct they were in defining the nonprofit user.
One of those needs is low cost solutions, but a good clarification that Michael brought up was that “free and open source†may not be clear to all individuals. While the software is free, it must be understood that if you are not a tech expert, you probably will need to pay to hire someone to set the software up.
Links to check out: Nten- http://www.nten.org/2009_ecosystem_report
NTEN aspires to a world where all nonprofit organizations skillfully and confidently use technology to meet community needs and fulfill their missions.
Tags: designer views, expert model, Nonprofit, ownership, relationship technology user, workflow
Posted in Meetups | 71 Comments »
Monday, May 31st, 2010
Date of Event: May 27, 2010
What: CMS Meetup Group
Who: The Last Thursday CMS Meetup
Where: Hoxton Hotel
What happened:
This evening was Meetup.com’s Last Thursday Group which concentrates on Content Management Systems. So of course I went along to see what people thought about Wordpress and a bit about using it with nonprofits. Got a lot of good feedback, however I think my slightly too large yellow notebook was a bit daunting. Need to switch to my smaller Rhodia pad. Anyway, just a note to myself.
Listing major pieces of information rather than writing in narrative fashion due to the amount of information received.
Blog vs. CMS: A few people noted Wordpress’ blogging emphasis, but also did understand its capabilities for a full CMS and with the right alterations is able to handle a variety of tasks. This has not been the case in other circumstances, where it was only known as a blogging platform.
Relationship between software and user: It had not occurred to me that not having to buy Wordpress as a product also changes the relationship between the technology and the organization as user or consumer. The exchange value is shifted and the organization using the open source software (usually) understands the “agreement†they are entering into. No longer are they able to be dependent on a third party for any software related problems, but they also have to take initiative to find their own solutions or find someone who can.  Not sure if this just causes organizations to be dependent on the web designer as the solution, or if organizations would take the opportunity to value Wordpress as something that needs to be used in their everyday processes. It is also true that many organizations needing websites do not necessarily play a large role in choosing their software, but rather go with whatever the web designer uses or suggests. Still there is a separation in the fact that the organization does not have to deal with the ties attached to proprietary software.
Wordpress popularity: I asked whether or not the popularity of Wordpress is changing the nature of content management systems as a whole, and the answer I received was negative. While the ease of use of WP is quite commendable, more change is happening within the software itself as its user base continues to build. Other CMSs may be more complicated, but  they do have their uses and benefits.
Wordpress restrictions: On that note, I have also heard a few people mention now that Wordpress does not handle a high volume of visitors. Not something I will have to worry about, but something still to keep in mind. I was told it has a lot to do with the number of plug-ins and changing the caching system.
Wordpress functionality: A lot people appear to be mentioning comparisons between other blogging software and Wordpress and that WP has many more options and functionality. I wonder how much of this is that people in the design industry want more functionality because they know what can be done, or if users as a whole are starting to want more options in their online projects.
Wordpress and nonprofits: Again, when asked what aspects of Wordpress are suitable for nonprofits…mentioned was that fact that it is free, the backend is easy to use and its features and plug-ins are nice additions to have for nonprofits. Some other reasons were that templates and its base are compliant, which takes away time consuming basic work that needs to be done.  I also asked if nonprofits often choose WP because of open source ideals, but everyone seemed to agree it was really just because it is free.
Ownership: Another interesting point that was brought up is that organizations like, and possibly need, to take ownership of their web presence. Open source and free software allows one to do this. If you can do what you please with Wordpress, because of its licensing then it also becomes a very appealing option. Larger businesses however, that have the money to spend on web development, appear to believe that free products are not to be trusted. I suppose then as nonprofits do not have an option, it does not become an issue. A good example the participants gave was Google Analytics, which is said to be the best tool in the industry of its kind, yet no larger business will use it, because it is free and therefore not trusted.
Investment: I also asked if giving clients the ability to update their own content provides people with some incentive to continue to update the site. The two people I was speaking to simultaneously shook their heads and said it really depends on the client. In their experience technology, or content management systems, while they did allow for greater interaction between the client and website, were only successful in certain contexts because the client really needed to want to use the software. That there is still the view that technology is to be taken care of by professionals and is not the job of the client. I wonder then if this attitude is more prevalent in the business rather than nonprofit arena, where again nonprofits may have to take on such tasks themselves.
Hierarchy: Continuing on that point, it was stated that a lot of the companies who do not want to update their own website, have a lot of hierarchy within the business. Bureaucracy simply gets in the way as content needs to be approved or posted and ends up being easier for a single person to take care of the task. While this makes sense and job roles do need to be assigned in larger corporation, I suppose it also limits input from a variety of viewpoints. In terms of my research, I will also need to make some sort of distinction between organizations that do have an in-house person to do website updating, vs. the outsourcing of a web designer that provides them with a CMS.
UCD: Another important distinction brought up was the utilization of UCD in the process of building software such as Wordpress vs. the utilization of UCD during actual site construction using Wordpress. So while I am looking at the user experience of Wordpress with nonprofits, I am not looking directly into what changes need to be made to make it more usable for nonprofits. I was surprised to hear that UCD really does not come in very much during the development of software. Wordpress then is probably slightly more popular because it has gone through many iterations and usability testing has been an aspect of this process. The Wordpress CMS is like a website that people need to be able to use, so it is understandable that the backend interface would have been tested.
Twitter: I was convinced to get a Twitter account during this meeting as I was told it is quite easy to search for Wordpress solutions and tips when you are having issues. Follow me if you please @kristinakek. Ugh.
Tags: cms, designer views, expert model, Nonprofit, ownership, relationship technology user, ucd, wordpress, workflow
Posted in Meetups | 57 Comments »
|
Applied Anthropology and Design is proudly powered by WordPress 2.9.2
|
|